(This page was automatically generated by the tools in the opsboy project on 15:46:45 27-May-2022 GMT.)

Detailed Test Report for ngx_eval in linux x86_64 (hv)

Summary

Commit Testing Time Unexpected
Failures
Expected
Failures
Files Tests Elapsed Time
e2ee05b4 2021-04-25 16:15:39 GMT 7 0 4 38 8 sec

LuaJIT

LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3, commit 70f88773

Compilation Errors

Unexpected Failures

File Name Details
bug.t TEST 1: bug ==27177== Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0]) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==27177== at 0x5047C50: __sendmsg_nocancel (in /lib64/libpthread-2.17.so)
==27177== by 0x434FD8: ngx_write_channel (ngx_channel.c:79)
==27177== by 0x436A7A: ngx_pass_open_channel (ngx_process_cycle.c:481)
==27177== by 0x436AFA: ngx_start_worker_processes (ngx_process_cycle.c:385)
==27177== by 0x43899A: ngx_master_process_cycle (ngx_process_cycle.c:241)
==27177== by 0x40E90F: main (nginx.c:386)
==27177== Address 0x1ffeffa08c is on thread 1's stack
==27177== in frame #2, created by ngx_pass_open_channel (ngx_process_cycle.c:455)
==27177==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Param
sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0])
fun:__sendmsg_nocancel
fun:ngx_write_channel
fun:ngx_pass_open_channel
fun:ngx_start_worker_processes
fun:ngx_master_process_cycle
fun:main
}
crash.t nginx: [emerg] "eval" directive is not allowed here in /home/ec2-user/git/eval-nginx-module/t/servroot/conf/nginx.conf:39
crash.t nginx: [emerg] "eval" directive is not allowed here in /home/ec2-user/git/eval-nginx-module/t/servroot/conf/nginx.conf:39
crash.t nginx: [emerg] "eval" directive is not allowed here in /home/ec2-user/git/eval-nginx-module/t/servroot/conf/nginx.conf:25
crash.t nginx: [emerg] "eval" directive is not allowed here in /home/ec2-user/git/eval-nginx-module/t/servroot/conf/nginx.conf:25
memc.t TEST 1: set in eval (NO subrequest in memory) ==27222== Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0]) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==27222== at 0x5047C50: __sendmsg_nocancel (in /lib64/libpthread-2.17.so)
==27222== by 0x434FD8: ngx_write_channel (ngx_channel.c:79)
==27222== by 0x436A7A: ngx_pass_open_channel (ngx_process_cycle.c:481)
==27222== by 0x436AFA: ngx_start_worker_processes (ngx_process_cycle.c:385)
==27222== by 0x43899A: ngx_master_process_cycle (ngx_process_cycle.c:241)
==27222== by 0x40E90F: main (nginx.c:386)
==27222== Address 0x1ffeffa08c is on thread 1's stack
==27222== in frame #2, created by ngx_pass_open_channel (ngx_process_cycle.c:455)
==27222==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Param
sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0])
fun:__sendmsg_nocancel
fun:ngx_write_channel
fun:ngx_pass_open_channel
fun:ngx_start_worker_processes
fun:ngx_master_process_cycle
fun:main
}
sanity.t TEST 4: eval with subrequest in memory ==27257== Syscall param sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0]) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==27257== at 0x5047C50: __sendmsg_nocancel (in /lib64/libpthread-2.17.so)
==27257== by 0x434FD8: ngx_write_channel (ngx_channel.c:79)
==27257== by 0x436A7A: ngx_pass_open_channel (ngx_process_cycle.c:481)
==27257== by 0x436AFA: ngx_start_worker_processes (ngx_process_cycle.c:385)
==27257== by 0x43899A: ngx_master_process_cycle (ngx_process_cycle.c:241)
==27257== by 0x40E90F: main (nginx.c:386)
==27257== Address 0x1ffeffa0ac is on thread 1's stack
==27257== in frame #2, created by ngx_pass_open_channel (ngx_process_cycle.c:455)
==27257==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Param
sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0])
fun:__sendmsg_nocancel
fun:ngx_write_channel
fun:ngx_pass_open_channel
fun:ngx_start_worker_processes
fun:ngx_master_process_cycle
fun:main
}

Expected Failures

(none)

Warnings

(none)

Go back to the index page.